0

0

That is 'by design' behavior in my experience.

0

0

Hold up, you don't necessarily need to create a custom attribute unless you cannot find an existing to match on. Here are more examples for you that may help. Update: Dynamic group population based on multiple criteria in OpsMgr 2007 [HOW-TO] Cre

0

0

In a previous post, we looked at how System Center Essentials 2010 leverages SCVMM 2008 R2 functionality to perform a virtual-to-virtual (V2V) conversion of VMware guests (see Test: Essentials 2010 Virtualization Management: Converting VMware Guests to H

1

1

Ronnie, never seen anyone write something from scratch for Hyper-V, but have looked at some 3rd party options for virtualization chargeback based on consumption. You might look at vKernel - http://www.vkernel.com/solutions/chargeback. VMware also off

0

0

To answer your core question here: Why does storage in an old server outperform a new desktop? Can't be 100% on your problem without looking at the exact hardware, but conceptually, I can answer this question. The answer is storage architecture. To elab

0

0

You could use an event collection or performance collection rule to gather data without alerting. As for monitors, you can override the GenerateAlert property = false.

0

0

Here are some samples to help you Script: Query Value from SQL Database (for 2-state monitor) Script: Query Value from SQL Database and Log Event How to create a Script-based 2-State Monitor (This should help you implement script first script)

0

0

Where I wound up with this was using AD sites for dynamic groups and a single monitor with recovies on both error and healthy state to take servers in and out of maintenance mode. Seems there are a quite a few options given enough time, I just can't see

0

0

Just bookmarking these for future reference. The Dell Storage Array MP 4.0 was released in January, meaning all Dell management packs have an updated MP now. Putting together some notes on Dell 4.0 tuning experience now... Download Locations Dell 4.0 Ser

0

0

And do be sure to consider if trap-based monitoring is the way you want to go. Probe-based monitoring allows you to control the flow a bit better, as even a filtered trap rule doesn't stop devices from sending loads of packets to your Essentials serve

0

0

Exactly. The problem is explained in detail in the community knowledge base articles SCOM 2007: Resolving False DNS 2003 Server External Addresses Resolution Alert ReSearch This! KB - DNS 2008 Server External Addresses Resolution Alert

0

0

I find having a list of these codes is a must have when troubleshooting update and deployment issues with Essentials 2010. I have seen it posted in a few different places, but here is the original source: Eric Brodish[MSFT] posted a verbose list of WSUS

0

0

I definitely like option 1 as the easiest way to achieve this in a dynamic fashion, with 3 as the likely way one could fill the gaps. Still trying to envision how Raphael's forecast could be avoided...lots of PowerShell and months of work

0

0

**Bump** this is a good question, but I am out of fuel (3am here). Maybe someone else has some thoughts on this.

0

0

here's an example: You have a group for Application X servers at each site so the local site administrator can get alerts. You next each of those groups in a group for Application X throughout the company. It would allow easy notification for the bra

0

0

thinking about that question all the way back to my MOM 2000 / 2005 days, it seems to me that 20 - 30 seconds was about the threshold under which no alert would be generated. I would suggest in your environment you setup a sample basic service model an

0

0

Criticality depends on the application - latency in the 100's of milliseconds can be near fatal for SQL performance. In Exchange, disk latency of 20 milliseconds is considered warning and 50 milliseconds critical (if memory serves). On the other hand, d